National economies have grown more interdependent and linked as a result of globalization, which is a process rather than an event (Essays, UK, 2013). It is, in essence, a dynamic process. Globalization is defined by the secretary general of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) as "the geographic dispersion of industrial and service activities, for example, research and development, sourcing of inputs, production and distribution, and the cross-border networking of companies through joint ventures and the sharing of assets." In his book The Race to the Top, the Swedish journalist stated: "Globalization is the process of shrinking the world, the shortening of distances, and the closeness of things," states The Real Story of Globalization. Larsson, T. (2001) "It permits the expanded world in order to benefit."

Evolution of Liberalisation in the Industry in India

In 1991, the Indian government, led by Dr. Manmohan Singh, the finance minister, and Shri Pamulaparti Venkata Narasimha Rao, the country's ninth prime minister, implemented a policy of economic liberalization and globalization that made it easy for any company to expand into foreign markets.

Every commercial organization in the liberalization period concentrates on its size and core competencies. These are necessary for businesses to develop and prosper. Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are strategic decisions made by businesses to advance their organizations. Through M&As, the corporations also accomplish corporate objectives such as empire expansion, profit, market dominance, and long-term survival. M&As are a strategic choice for inorganic expansion, with the ultimate goal being to increase shareholder wealth. Globally, this trend is growing. M&A activity has grown dramatically in India.

From the foregoing, it is clear that businesses intentionally used mergers and acquisitions to grow and expand their operations during the globalization process.

Mergers and Acquisitions

The word "mergers and acquisitions" in the book "Merger, Acquisitions, and Corporate Restructuring" refers to a variety of stake purchase and asset control actions. Additionally, mergers and acquisitions have motivations.

Meaning of Mergers and Acquisitions:

According to Gaughan (2007), corporate restructuring is a general phrase that includes mergers and acquisitions (M&As), which are used interchangeably but together comprise the different types of transactions involving the purchase of rights in other businesses. The following explains these forms in detail:

Mergers: According to Wohlner (2016), a merger occurs when two businesses combine, with only one of them surviving and the other going out of business. This formula, which is particularly useful for mergers and acquisitions, states that one plus one equals three rather than two. The main idea behind buying a business is to increase shareholder wealth in addition to the company's expansion. The rationale behind M&A is that the combined value of two distinct businesses is at least greater than that of a single business.

Acquisitions and Takeovers: "Taking control of a firm by purchasing 51 percent (or more) of its voting shares or taking possession of an asset by purchase" is the definition of "acquisition" according to the online business dictionary. BusinessDictionary.com.  

Acquisitions are a component of a company's growth strategy, according to the Investopedia website. Expanding the business and acquiring more of an established company's operations are beneficial. Acquisitions can be made with cash, company shares, or occasionally a combination of both. Furthermore, it might be either friendly or aggressive. The term "acquisition" typically refers to a larger company buying a smaller one, but occasionally a smaller company takes over management of a larger, more established company while retaining its name for the merged business. This is referred to as an acquisition or reverse takeover. Investopedia (2016).

Types of Mergers and Acquisitions

In the book called Merger, Acquisitions, and Corporate Restructurings, Gaughan (2007) describes the types of Mergers, below paragraphs explained it in detail.

Horizontal Merger: The businesses involved in these mergers are comparable to one another. Reaching new markets, growing the organization, and increasing market share are the primary goals of this. In these kinds of mergers, chances to combine business operations, such production, to save costs are created by the companies' similar business processes.

Vertical Merger: In this type of merger, both the companies’ join that are possibly not able to compete separately but they exist in the similar supply chain.

Forward integration and 2. Backward Integration.

In forward, firm buys a customer and in backward, a firm acquires a supplier.

Conglomerate Mergers: Conglomerate mergers differ from the two categories mentioned above. This kind of merger involves two distinct companies that operate in completely different markets. There might not be any business or product synergy between them. Parent business gains and portfolio diversification are the goals of these kinds of transactions.

Lending buyouts (LBOs):  All of the shares and assets that are familiar with the Stock Exchange are included in this purchase. Investors are responsible for this; lending is the primary source of funding for the transaction. Investment banks or businesses that specialize in buyouts are considered financiers. Following the buyout, the acquired company functions as a business with a small number of stockholders.

Management buyouts (MBOs): This kind involves a group of management executives taking the initiative to purchase a portion of the company's shares, with the remaining funds being put as investment bank loans or share capital.

Unit MBOs: In this scenario, buyers are typically instructed to purchase a subsidiary company by a manager of the parent company. These are unique forms in which buyers pay a portion of the money and investment banks take the remaining amount.

Reverse LBOs: Using this strategy, a stockholder who is not disclosed to the stock exchange participates in the issuance of rights in relation to a company that has already entered the money market. They purchase the first and introduce it safely to the stock exchange using the drawn capitals.

Motives behind Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As)

The book Mergers and Acquisitions: Strategy, Valuation, and Integration by Ray (2010) does a great job of explaining the reasons behind mergers. M&As are options for businesses for a variety of reasons. Some of the major reasons for merger are listed below:

Growth: Growth is the primary driving force behind all M&As. The businesses might choose to grow organically or internally or through mergers and acquisitions. If we take a closer look, there are two different ways that a business might expand. Internal growth occurs when a business expands using its own resources. For a company looking for a window of opportunity, this is time-consuming and ineffective. This kind of growth offers a temporary edge over rivals. The merger and acquisition of the resources required to accomplish the objectives would be the most efficient means of achieving expansion.

Operating Synergy: One of the most popular justifications for mergers is this. Synergy is the 2+2=5 phenomena. It implies that the value of the company formed as a result of the merger will surpass the total value of the newly combined businesses. By lowering the company's expenses in relation to comparable income streams and preventing operational redundancy, it lowers fixed costs and boosts profit margins. The company's size grows as a result of the expansion. It reduces expenses and increases revenue. It increased market reach, decreased personnel costs, and updated technology.

Financial synergy: Improved creditworthiness is the financial synergy. It indicates that the business may readily buy the products on credit. Both bank loans and market capitalization are available to the company. Because it lowers the cost of capital, investors expect a lower rate of return on their capital because they view the combined company as large and secure. When a merger boosts debt capacity, cash flows and earnings become more stable than they were prior to the merger. This makes it easier for the company to get more loans.  The value per share rises as a result. The company's P/E is higher in the market as a result of all these factors. It increases capital and decreases cost floating.

Risk Diversification: A company's risk increases when it manufactures a single product since its cash flow and profits fluctuate greatly, while diversification lowers that risk. Diversification lowers risk since it will stabilize the profitability of negatively connected enterprises.

Building of Empire: The manager's authority will be immediately increased. In some instances, the executive management team's compensation was determined by the total profit rather than the profit per share. The team's decision to lower the profit per share rather than raise it infuriated the company's shareholders, but several empirical studies show that pay is correlated with success rather than meagre earnings.

Growth of Mergers and Acquisitions

M&As are an organization's strategic option for global corporate expansion in the modern era. There are several waves explained in the pieces of Literatures, the growth of M&As that caused some favourable climate for the business and end due to economic or regulatory reasons. According to Lipton (2006), the US has experienced numerous waves of mergers over a longer time span.

In the modern era, M&As are an organization's strategic choice for international business expansion. The literature explains a number of waves, including the expansion of M&As that created a favorable business environment but ended for regulatory or economic reasons. Lipton (2006) claims that over a longer period of time, the US has seen multiple waves of mergers.

The following wave, which boosted vertical mergers in the US between 1919 and 1929, came to a stop because of the 1929 crisis and misery. The third wave of conglomerates, which lasted from 1955 to 1969 and gave rise to diversification into new sectors and industries, came to an end in 1969–1970 with the stock market crash. The fourth wave of hostile bids and takeovers occurred between 1980 and 1989.  The junk bond market's demise marked its conclusion. The crisis and suffering of 1929 put an end to the subsequent wave that had encouraged vertical mergers in the US between 1919 and 1929. The stock market crash in 1969–1970 put a stop to the third wave of conglomerates, which spanned 1955–1969 and led to diversification into new areas and industries. Between 1980 and 1989, there was a fourth wave of hostile takeovers and bids.  It came to an end with the collapse of the junk bond market.  Later, this wave of mergers and acquisitions increased dramatically in the emerging markets with Asian economies. Global M&A activity hit a record 30% in 2006, according to Kaur (2015). According to Dobbs, Goedhart, and Suonio (2007), the total value of $3.7 trillion surpassed the peak of $3.4 trillion in 2000. According to the researchers' analysis, the United States was the top option for acquisition, accounting for almost 40% of global merger activity, while the United Kingdom was the most popular European nation. Later, this wave of mergers and acquisitions increased dramatically in the emerging markets with Asian economies. Global M&A activity hit a record 30% in 2006, according to Kaur (2015). According to Dobbs, Goedhart, and Suonio (2007), the total value of $3.7 trillion surpassed the peak of $3.4 trillion in 2000. According to the researchers' analysis, the United States was the top option for acquisition, accounting for almost 40% of global merger activity, while the United Kingdom was the most popular European nation.

Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on the Corporate Performance

Subsequently, the emerging markets with Asian economies saw a sharp rise in this wave of mergers and acquisitions. According to Kaur (2015), global M&A activity reached a record 30% in 2006. Dobbs, Goedhart, and Suonio (2007) state that the $3.7 trillion overall value exceeded the $3.4 trillion peak in 2000. The United States was the most popular alternative for acquisition, accounting for about 40% of global merger activity, while the United Kingdom was the most popular European country, according to the researchers' findings. However, the companies only spent six times as much on acquisitions later on. There are numerous reasons given for the inability to both improve company performance and achieve the M&A's stated goals.

M&A is expanding in the Indian economy, especially since economic reforms were put into place in 1991. Businesses were encouraged by a favorable regulatory and economic environment as a result of this reform. However, given the widespread reports of value destruction brought about by mergers and acquisitions in businesses as well as to the wealth of shareholders, it is necessary to investigate if the shareholders of acquiring pharmaceutical companies may make any meaningful long-term profits. Do the acquiring company's financial results improve over time?

The impact of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on the globalization process has been investigated in this conceptual framework study, emphasizing their strategic importance in forming the contemporary global business environment. In an increasingly interconnected global economy, mergers and acquisitions have become a vital tool for businesses to grow beyond national borders, access foreign markets, acquire cutting-edge technologies, and gain a competitive edge.

The report highlights that by allowing businesses to quickly integrate global resources, diversify operations, and take advantage of economies of scale and scope, M&A activities promote globalization. In particular, cross-border mergers and acquisitions are essential for boosting global value chain integration, expediting market entry, and promoting knowledge transfer. Simultaneously, the conceptual framework highlights how economic, regulatory, cultural, and technological aspects impact the effectiveness of globalization efforts led by mergers and acquisitions.

The paper emphasizes how M&A transactions support globalization by enabling companies to swiftly integrate global resources, diversify operations, and benefit from economies of scale and scope. In particular, accelerating market entry, fostering knowledge transfer, and strengthening global value chain integration all depend on cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Concurrently, the conceptual framework emphasizes how technological, cultural, legal, and economic factors affect the success of globalization initiatives spearheaded by mergers and acquisitions.

In conclusion, by allowing businesses to grow globally, improve their competitive posture, and adapt to changing market conditions, mergers and acquisitions act as a potent driver for globalization. Researchers, policymakers, and business decision-makers can all benefit from the conceptual framework this study produced, which offers an organized understanding of the connection between M&A and globalization. To validate the suggested paradigm and evaluate the long-term strategic and economic effects of mergers and acquisitions in the worldwide business environment, more empirical study is advised.

1. Essays, UK. (November 2013). Main Economic Case In Favour Of Globalisation. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/main-economic-case-in-favour-of-globalisation.php?cref=1
2. Larsson, Thomas. (2001). The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute. p. 9. ISBN 978-1930865150
3. Gaughan, Patrick A. (2007) Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings-4th ed. ISBN: 978–0–471–70564–2 (cloth)
4. Wohlner R (2016) Mergers and Acquisitions: Definition Retrieved from tps://www.investopedia.com/university/mergers/mergers1.asp
5. BusinessDictionary.com. Retrieved from BusinessDictionary.com
6. Website: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/acquisition.html
7. Retrived from the website
8. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/acquisition.asp
9. Kamal Ghosh Ray (2010) “Mergers and Acquisitions, Strategy, Valuation and Integration” PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
10. Lipton, M. (2006) Merger Waves in the 19th, 20th and 21st Centuries. The Davies Lecture, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University.
11. Kaur T (2015). Merger Waves: An Insight into Mergers & Acquisitions Activity in U.S., U.K., and India, Pezzottaite Journals, April – June’ 2015, Volume 4, Number 2
12. Dobbs, R, Goedhart, M. and Suonio, H. (2007):‘Are Companies Getting Better at M&As?’, McKinsey on Finance, Winter
13. New study reveals why so many M&A deals fail (2002, December).Finance Executive’s News, i12, p. 4
14. Moeller, Sara B., Frederick P. Schlingemann, and Rene M. Stulz, 2005, Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave, Journal of Finance 60(2), 757-782.
15. Meena, S. (2014). Prospects Of Global Mergers And Acquisitions - An Indian Overview. International Journal of Research in Business Management, 2(9): 71-80.
16. Kanika & Nancy, (2013). Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions by Indian firms- An Analysis of Pre and Post Merger Performance. International Journal of Management & Information Technology, 4 (2): 227-236.
17. Garg, V. & Satish, K. (2011). High Performance through Mergers and Acquisitions: A General Analysis. VSRD-IJBMR, 1: 660-667.
18. Alam, A, Khan, S & Zafar, F. (2014). Strategic Management: Managing Mergers & Acquisitions. International Journal of BRIC Business Research, 3.
19. Xie, E, Reddy, K & Liang, J. (2016). Country-Specific Determinants of Cross-Border Mergers And Acquisitions: A Comprehensive Review and Future Research Directions. Journal of World Business, 52: 127-183.
20. Nicholson, R. & Salaber, J. (2013). The motives and performance of cross-border acquirers from emerging economies: Comparison between Chinese and Indian firms. International Business Review, 22: 963-980.
21. Duncan, C & Mtar, M. (2006). Determinants of International Acquisition Success: Lessons from First Group in North America. European Management Journal, 24: 396-410.